Grizzly Review: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part Two!

The series that sucked in the lives of millions of people worldwide has finally reached its conclusion.  It’s not even the weekend yet, and the franchise has already pulled in a cool $126 million.  Millions of fans dressed as wizards have crowded the midnight halls of local movie theaters for the last time.  Some have been die-hard fans of the books (as I am), and some just wanted to see Voldemort bitch-slapped in his creepy snake face.  Whichever the case, Warner Brothers turned out a final film that young and old, casual or die-hard fan, could sit back and enjoy.

SPOILERS AHEAD..

The film opened exactly where the last one left off.  Harry (Daniel Radcliffe) had just buried Dobby at Shell Cottage and is preparing his strategy against Voldemort (who is off rifling through Dumbledore’s grave for the Elder Wand).  Harry’s mission, left to him by the late Albus Dumbledore, was to hunt down Voldemort’s horcruxes (pieces of his soul left in inanimate objects to anchor him to immortal life) and destroy them.  Up until this point, three of the horcruxes have been destroyed  – Tom Riddle’s Diary in the Chamber of Secrets, Slytherin’s locket in Deathly Hallows Part One, and Marvolo Gaunt’s ring by Dumbledore.  It has been assumed that Voldemort split his soul into seven pieces including himself, which would leave three left to be destroyed – Hufflepuff’s Cup, Nagini the snake, and an unknown object.  Harry believes that one of the objects is hidden in the Lestrange family vault in Gringotts, the wizarding bank run by goblins.

Griphook – The most awesome banker you’ll ever meet.

We have also learned in the previous film the importance and identity of the Deathly Hallows.  The Deathly Hallows were unspeakable gifts given by Death himself to the three Peverell brothers.  The first brother was given the Elder Wand, which made whoever owned it unbeatable.  The second brother was given the Resurrection Stone, which could temporarily bring back loved ones from the dead.  The youngest brother was given a Cloak of Invisibility.  Whoever owns all three becomes the Master of Death.

“So you’re saying no more Harry Potter movies? Ever?”

Here at Shell Cottage, Harry is given a choice.  In one room is Griphook (Warwick Davis), a goblin who holds the key to breaking into the Gringotts vault to keep destroying Horcruxes.  In another room is Ollivander (John Hurt), a wand maker, who holds all the knowledge he needs to retrieve the Elder Wand, the only Deathly Hallow not in his possession.  In the end, Harry chooses his selfless mission over power, and gains the necessary knowledge from Griphook to break into the vault of Bellatrix Lestrange (Helena Bonham Carter).

After breaking in and destroying the horcrux (Hufflepuff’s cup), Griphook betrays Harry, Ron (Rupert Grint) and Hermione (Emma Watson) in order to steal the goblin-made sword of Gryffindor.  They escape on the back of a dragon and end up in Hogsmeade.  With the help of Dumbledore’s brother, Aberforth (Ciaran Hinds), they make their way into Hogwarts to find the unknown Horcrux, which they believe is an object belonging to Ravenclaw.  Luna Lovegood (Evanna Lynch) suggests that the object is Rowena Ravenclaw’s diadem, a type of crown.  Harry goes to the Grey Lady, the ghost of Helena Ravenclaw (Kelly Macdonald), and she tells him where the diadem is hidden.

Harry retrieves the diadem but is met by Draco Malfoy (Tom Felton) and his goonies, one of which starts a raging fire.  Harry saves Draco from the fire (why anyone would save that ferret-faced bastard is beyond me) and manages to destroy the diadem in the process.  Ron and Hermione find their way down to the Chamber of Secrets to find Basilisk fangs (because, conveniently, basilisk venom destroys Horcruxes) and destroy Hufflepuff’s cup.  And then, to celebrate, they start making out.

“I’m a terrible Death Eater guys… will you hold my hands?”

Meanwhile, Voldemort (Ralph Fiennes) and his Death Eaters have breached the defenses of the castle and are reigning their terror over the students and teachers.  Voldemort, who is now in possession of the Elder Wand, realizes that the wand has not given allegiance to him.  Believing that Snape had become owner of the wand during his murder of Dumbledore, Voldemort uses his snake to attack Snape.  While Snape is dying, he places his tears in a vial and tells Harry to take them to the Penseive.

Harry does, and much is made clear to him through Snape’s memories.  He discovers that Dumbledore was right to trust Snape, that all these years there was one very real reason Snape could not swear allegiance to Voldemort ever again – Snape was passionately in love with Lily, Harry’s mother, who was killed by Voldemort himself.  Makes sense why he hated Harry so much, then, since Harry was supposed to have been the spitting image of his father (who looks like a math teacher apparently).  He also discovered something much more heartbreaking – that he, Harry, was also a Horcrux, and he must also be destroyed in order for Voldemort to be defeated.

Harry then meets Voldemort in the forest, where Voldemort uses the killing curse on him.  Harry is transported to a train station, an interim location between life and death, where he speaks with Dumbledore (Michael Gambon) about all that has happened.  Harry is given the choice to move on to death, or to remain in life and finish the job he started, without the piece of Voldemort’s soul within him.  So he returns; and with the help of new Hogwarts resident badass, Neville Longbottom (Matthew Lewis), and his snake slicing skills, Voldemort is defeated!  Hooray!

I try to have an open mind going into these films.  If anyone out there is as into reading as I am, you know how disappointed you can be if the film deviates from the story you love.  It’s natural.  However, this film was as close as you can get to the line between following the story and making a good film in itself.  I was pleasantly surprised that much of the script was lifted from the book itself, including most of Snape’s memories and the scene with Dumbledore at King’s Cross.

“Not my daughter, you BITCH!” (Actual quote)

The pacing, the music, and acting were all perhaps the best I’ve seen in the franchise.  There was so much that could have gone wrong in this, the culmination of this long beloved story, that it was refreshing to see the filmmakers do it right for a change.  My one complaint is that this still felt like half of a movie, and there was little to tie in the story from Deathly Hallows Part One.  I imagine the two will be released on DVD and Blu-Ray as one big film (taking a page from the consecutive style of Lord of the Rings).

There were several things I was worried wouldn’t translate to film, or wouldn’t be handled properly or glossed over.  The first and most important being the heartbreaking story of one Severus Snape.  Alan Rickman stole the show on this one.  He owned that character.  He had known before anyone, before the final few books were even released, what his character’s inner torment was and where his motivations lie.  He brilliantly has managed to keep that knowledge a secret in his performance while still making it believable, so the film audience would be just as invested and just as surprised as those who had read the books.

My second worry was that the ending, the imminent downfall of He-Who-Shall-Not-Be-Named, would be glossed over and cheesy.  However that, too, was given sufficient story-telling time and consideration.  Although I didn’t really understand why Harry and Voldemort were flying through the air hugging each other, their duel was action-packed and interesting.  There was enough time spent on the Elder Wand for the casual film-watcher to understand why Voldemort’s wand had failed him, although I missed Harry’s “Expelliarmus!”

“Booyah! I mean, Expelliarmus!”

The third and final worry of mine was their treatment of the epilogue at King’s Cross station, and how they were going to make a group of kids in their late teens and early twenties look like real live grownups.  With a little CGI and a little makeup (though none for Emma Watson, apparently), they managed to look….ALMOST right.  I thought Draco Malfoy was the worst; he looked like the star of the school play.  But it was cutesy, it provided closure, and it was just as weird and awkward as it was in the book.

Bwahahaha! Fail!

All in all, I really enjoyed the film.  It has that little something for everyone – intrigue, action, drama, and romance.  The story is much darker than the others, even in the books, and provides for less comedy which is unfortunate.  And with all the important people who died (albeit, without death scenes), it makes for a huge downer at times.  But that’s war, and that’s life sometimes.

I give the film 4 bears (it was 4.5, but I deducted the .5 for the lack of Jim Broadbent)!

THE THING (2011) – Pictures, Posters, and the Trailer…

One of my all-time favorite Horror/Sci-Fi movies is without a doubt, 1982’s The Thing (inspired by 1951 original). Directed by horror legend John Carpenter, the movie starred a rare all male cast that included Kurt Russell, Keith David (They Live), and Richard Masur (License to Drive).

And of course, Wilford Brimley.

It was about a group of American scientists in Antarctica, shut off from the world, and confronted by an other worldly danger. It’s was free of CGI and chalk-full of awesome old school effects. The movie was a great example of an excellent ensemble cast and had awesome tension though-out. It is, to date, what I consider to be Kurt Russell’s finest performance.

Now we are about to get a some more back story on the classic. 2011’s The Thing not be a remake as originally thought, but will be a prequel to the 80’s version. This time  chronicling what happened in the week prior to the events of the original. It will take place at the Norwegian base from which ‘the thing’ came from in the form of a dog last time.

I’ve been curious to see what they were gonna do with this, and I am admittedly pleased  it’s in fact a prequel instead of a remake. And bonus – I like the cast. Namely, the star, our inaugural Grizzly Girl – Mary Elizabeth Winstead. Anyhow, here is the trailer…

Personally, I don’t think the trailer was great, but my interest remains peaked. Aside from Mary, I also really like Eric Christian Olsen (Community) despite his mostly terrible resume, and Joel Edgerton (upcoming Warrior) shows promise.

Here are some production shots…

The new poster looks a lot like the old one…

And a BONUS, for those who haven’t seen it…

http://youtu.be/ouZkkIsLiNg

and DOUBLE BONUS – The movie that inspired that one…

NHL Goalie Loves ‘The Evil Dead’ – Steve Mason’s Tribute Mask

Columbus Blue Jackets goalie Steve Mason seems to be a bit of a horror fan.  He has released some images of his new mask on Twitter. His new mask on one side, has the Ohio state flag, which is pretty bad ass for a flag given its cool shape.

On the other side of the helmet though are the ghosts of the civil war, which ties in with the name Blue Jackets and the Columbus third jersey which has a Civil War canon on it.

Continue reading NHL Goalie Loves ‘The Evil Dead’ – Steve Mason’s Tribute Mask

‘Batman: Year One’ Trailer Debuts!

We’ve seen and spoke a little bit about the next movie coming out from the DC Animated Collection, and I think it’s one most fans are very excited to see. Known as one of the greatest storylines in not just Batman, but comics altogether. It was a bit of a surprise that DC chose this as their next title to adapt, but it makes this fanboy very, very happy.

Continue reading ‘Batman: Year One’ Trailer Debuts!

‘Evil Dead’ Sequel/Remake Confirmed!

I have been a fan of Evil Dead since I was old enough to watch movies. The entire trilogy was a monumental part of my cinematic development, crafting my tastes and humor at an early age, and ultimatly instilling a deep love for anything related to Bruce Campbell.

Evil Dead was a very low budget extremely indie movie made by Sam Raimi and Bruce Campbell. Both have moved on to impressive careers and cult favorite status. It told the story of Ash, a young man who goes to a cabin in the woods with his friends, and is soon plagued by a night of evil. And hilarity. The second and third movies got even funnier, and nothing beats Evil Dead 2.

Continue reading ‘Evil Dead’ Sequel/Remake Confirmed!

Mad Max 4: Fury Road – Tom Hardy, Charlize Theron, and a New Car…

The Mad Max trilogy, starring a young Mel Gibson, ran from 1979 to 1985, and included 2 great movies, and then a 3rd one with Tina Turner.


The movies centered around a post-apocalyptic society and a man driven to the edge. Max Rockatansky was a cop when things first got bad. Once his partner was injured (set on fire) and gangs overran the city, Max resigned. He took his family and got out, but it was too late though. While in the country a motorcycle gang attempts to rape Max’s wife, before ultimately killing her and Max’s infant son. This event (understandably) triggered his transformation, and from there he hunts down and kills all the members of the gang. In the next 2 movies we focus more on the dilapidation of society and the value of things like gasoline and methane.

These are the movies that put Mel Gibson on the map, and now there is a plan for a 4th installment – Mad Max: Fury Road. Now in recent years Mel Gibson has fallen from one of Hollywood’s most beloved stars, to one of its most despised. A lot of these of course is due to the saturation of media coverage on his racist comments to police when he got his DUI, and again when threatening his mistress over the answering machine. But myself, when I look at him, I don’t think of him as a crazy drunk Jesus-Freak racist, I still see the guy I grew up watching as Mad Max and Martin Riggs. I try to separate that from who he is in real life. Without the ability to separate that stuff, I would despise most of Hollywood. That being said, even if he weren’t too old to reprise this role, I gotta say, his replacement – Tom Hardy, he’s a better fit anyhow.

Don’t get me wrong, Gibson was brilliant in the original movies, but right now, Tom Hardy might be my favorite actor. It obviously doesn’t hurt that he’s playing Bane in the next Batman movie, or that he was in last year’s mega-hit Inception, but he was actually cast as Max before either of those. Here is a guy who seems to be able to do no wrong. Even a movie like Bronson, which I didn’t really care for as a whole, excellently showcased his talents. Tom Hardy isn’t the only casting announcement though. Charlize Theron (Arrested Development), Teresa Palmer (I Am Number Four), Zoë Kravitz (X-Men: First Class), and Adelaide Clemens (X-Men Origins: Wolverine) are all signed on as well, which already puts more beautiful women in this movie than the original, which speaks volumes about the state of casting in Hollywood…

So now, not only have they cast a bunch of babes, but even more importantly, they’ve got a car…

Now in the original movie Max drove a 1973, V-8, Ford XB Falcon Coupe.:

In preparation for the new movie, Ford has unveiled 2 concept cars based of the old model, one of which will be used in the next movie.  You can vote on which you think he should drive at Top Gear Australia.


As for the film itself, it’s rumored to take place just after Beyond Thunderdome, and thankfully is still being helmed by George Miller. Miller directed all of the other 3 movies and has been reportedly working on this one for 25+ years. The project has gone through a lot of changes, and was at one point, even rumored to be an anime. The movie’s production has been delayed several times, but is said to finally start filming in January of 2012.

Hardy talked to Flicks News last year about the project:

Q: Can you talk about how you got involved? Is that shooting? Is it ready to go?

Tom Hardy: I’m obviously limited as to what I can say. These things are always binded to secrecy and I think that’s a good thing for the film anyway. I’m not allowed to give away anything. Without incriminating myself in any way, it’s a very big film. To step into the shoes of Mel Gibson… George [Miller] and Mel created the franchise “Mad Max,” which started off as an independent which then blew up. It took off. It became the “Mad Max” as you know it with t-shirts and DVDs. No computer game yet, but you know, it was early days. This was back before internet. Before all that sort of stuff. I was born the year it came out, so now it’s very funny that I’ve now been asked to play Mad Max. I spent four hours. It was kind of an anomaly. There were many, many actors that would probably be right for Mad Max and there’s many out there who could probably do an exceptional job to portray him. It’s especially a challenge to step in the shoes of such an iconic character. I’m aware that I’m going to take a certain number of casualties when I go in and play him. If I concentrate on that, it’s obviously not going to be the best thing for the project. We have to take it differently, as George is taking it. It’s a relaunch and revisit to the world. An entire restructuring. That’s not to say that it’s not picking up or leaving off from the Mad Max you know already, but it’s a nice re-take on the entire world using the same character, depositing him in the same world, but bringing him up to date by 30 years. Mel would be perfect for it but, for some reason, he’s not doing it and I am. You can expect the same amount of grit and rawness and authenticity and performance, I hope to deliver. But that’s really the crux of me and George to deliver and all the other actors as the other characters. But also we have the new world afforded to filmmakers today with all the opportunities. I think the boys that did “Lord of the Rings” are involved. That kind of stuff as well. CGI is not going to be — I think it’s going to be much more about how you deal with action. These things are going to be really there. Big rigs, big explosions, big car crashes. Big violence, you know. It’s going to actually happen as opposed to doing a 2D turned to 3D screen. It’s going to be an adventure, let’s put it that way. We’re shooting for a year.

Q: Can you at least say when you’re going to be in front of the cameras?

Hardy: I can’t say when I’m going to be in front of the cameras. I’m actually headed tonight to Australia to start some stunt-training. I’m training now. Even though I’m smoking. I’m meant to drop 30 pounds so smoking and one meal a day is my training at the moment. I’m going to start fighting soon. The harder stuff, as we get close to the line. I’ll probably get three or four months of fight training out there. Seven days a week. All that kind of horrible s**t.

Q: So you’re going to train for three months and then shoot for a year?

Hardy: Shooting is probably nine months. Training is allocated as two months. We don’t know if that’s going to push a little bit or come up a little bit. It’s a gray area. There’s very anomalies and shifting papers. All kinds of people’s shifting schedules, from what I’m aware, need to be tied down. The movie is absolutely healthy. It is going, it’s just a question of, not if, when precisely.

Q: You mention shooting in Australia? Have they decided to displace the geographic non-specificity of the original?

Hardy: It’s absolutely the same spot. The same spot.

Q: So you’re going to have an Australian accent?

Hardy: This is a new area to me. It’s up to people like George. I don’t know. I don’t know. Whatever suits the revisit. It would be bold for me to give you an honest answer now. I don’t know and a lot has to be left to the process. It depends on what feeds the project for the best of the project, always.

Q: You’re dropping 30 pounds?

Hardy: I’ve already dropped it.

Q: Are you aiming for a muscular cut, being very thin? What the look you’ve envisioned?

Hardy: Imagine a hungry wolf. Or like when you put a cat in the bath. You grab a cat by the throat and stuff it under the f**king water. You know what it looks like? That’s what I’m going to look like. But like a puma. Very hungry at very dangerous. It’s imperative. This is the kind of guy who’s not well. So I have to create that reality.

The movie, once it gets going, will be shot in 3D, not shot in 2D and then converted, but shot using the same technology Cameron used on Avatar. That means it will be one the rare movies that I actually see in 3D.

“I’m gonna look SO good in 3D…”

The movie expects to release sometime either next year or early 2013, and I’ll be there opening night…

THE ORIGINAL MOVIE POSTER – Before Mel Gibson was a star…